Everybody wants to live a happy life in his or her house. In the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the pursuit of a happy life within the confines of one’s home is not merely a dream but a reality, thanks to the people-centric policies implemented by the state.
Addressing the housing needs of its citizens stands as a cornerstone of the DPRK’s important policies. Year after year, the state undertakes regular housing construction to meet the growing demand, providing houses built at the state’s expense to working individuals free of charge. Notably, this effort persists regardless of the prevailing conditions, demonstrating an unwavering commitment to the well-being of the people.
In recent years, nationwide construction initiatives have surged, marking a more active period than ever before. Top among these endeavors is the ambitious goal to elevate the standard of living by addressing the housing needs of the people comprehensively. The construction of 50,000 flats in the capital city of Pyongyang exemplifies this commitment, aligning with the strategic vision outlined in the decision of the Eighth Congress of the Workers’ Party of Korea to position the DPRK as a pioneer in solving the housing problem.
Key achievements include the completion of Songhwa Street in 2022 and Hwasong Street in 2023, emblematic of the nation’s dedication to tangible progress.
This commitment extends beyond Pyongyang, reaching the countryside where housing construction is accelerating too. State-sponsored policies ensure the regular provision of cement for rural housing construction, and their implementation is robustly guaranteed by law. Regions across the country boast powerful construction forces dedicated to erecting numerous new dwelling houses, with the state entirely covering construction expenses, ensuring that these homes are provided free of charge.
As a result of these initiatives, the Korean people are reveling in a happy life within the splendid houses provided by the state completely free of charge, showcasing the positive impact of these quality living policies.”
